Woman with blond hair at a desk, using clear writing for impact while writing in a notebook and on her laptop.
Posted on

Without clear writing, your impact is invisible

Great work hidden behind average writing stays invisible. Discover why clear writing for impact is essential, not optional.

Reading time 3 mins | By Lee Ellwood

Why is clear writing vital for purpose-led organisations? Surely the life-changing work you’re doing is more important than the reporting and documenting you only do because you have to.

Well, yes, and no. Impact work needs funding, awareness, engagement and support to be able to continue, and that requires writing. This is important because it’s only through your writing that funders, policy makers, awards judges and the general public meet your work. Unless they’re participants in your projects, they'll only ever meet what’s written about it.

If your writing is clear, succinct, audience-focused and outcomes-centred, those so-important readers can easily visualise your impact, and they'll be more likely to buy in to your activity. But if your writing is unclear, dense, organisation-focused or compliance-based, the good work that you’re describing will effectively be invisible.

This is the central problem that good writing solves: how to get your work seen – and felt. Clear writing for impact makes for-purpose work visible, which opens doors to funding, support and recognition.

The visibility gap

The space between what you do and what people see of it is your ‘visibility gap’. For non-profits and purpose-led people, writing is often an under-appreciated secret weapon for closing that gap.

  • If you’ve received funding for a program, you must report against that program to account for your funding. But don’t write an audit: tell your impact story.
  • If your research could change lives by shaping policy, you need to write policy submissions. But don’t write dense-and-dry: make it easy for the policy maker to extract the value.
  • If your service supports people in difficulty, you have to write on your website how you do it, including your terms and conditions. But don’t write complex legalese: make it easy for people to see straight away that you can help them.

Impact reporting, content writing, legal and policy writing and research writing are all forms that for-purpose organisations need to use. They may sound different, but they share a key common feature: if your writing doesn’t serve your reader’s needs, the work behind them will remain invisible.

How is your writing hiding your work?

Example #1: ineffective T&Cs

A new community service sets up, ready to support and protect vulnerable people. It implements a client agreement. But the terms and conditions are written by the service’s lawyer – in dense legal language, with cross-referencing, multi-level numbering and layers of conditional clauses.

Once work gets underway, the service staff find themselves wasting valuable time fielding the same questions over and over. Clients have no hope of understanding what they’re agreeing to, and they give up on accessing the help that’s available – because they can’t see it.

(Even though the client agreement is a legal-ish document, plain language would help clients see this service clearly.)

Example #2: the annual non-report

A non-for-profit has achieved amazing change for its client community – helping migrant women re-enter the workforce in meaningful employment. Its annual report project is allocated to an overworked, under-resourced program manager, who cuts and pastes from colleagues’ emails into a template. The result is an uneven report full of sector jargon, tables of outputs and varying voices, with no unifying central message and an incohesive structure.

The funding organisation can’t see clearly what’s actually been achieved with their money, and they start to doubt their investment.

(Understanding how good business writing sets you apart would turn this annual report from difficult to dynamic.)

Compliance vs storytelling

It’s actually not an either/or situation. Your writing can be both clear and detailed, engaging and accurate, factual and narrative.

Plain language for non-profits in Australian doesn’t mean watering down the substance of your writing. Funders want the figures, policy makers need the evidence, and clients and supporters wonder what it is you do. So present the facts, but weave them into a story: the story of your achievements.

Invest a little time in producing writing that makes your hard work visible. For example:

  • Structure your document so your reader can follow your narrative, skim if necessary, and act quickly.
  • Learn plain language principles and apply them: active voice, everyday words, few (if any) acronyms.
  • Tell the story of your work, rather than stating facts and figures.
  • Talk about outcomes, not outputs.

Clear writing for impact is part of the work

When we talk about ‘good writing’, we don’t mean ‘nice-sounding words’. We’re talking about effective writing: documents and reports that achieve what you want them to. For non-profit work, that means making your real work visible to the people who can support it, rely on it, fund it or recognise it.

That’s why we believe that writing for impact isn’t separate from the work itself: it’s the door through which people who matter can meet work that matters.

Is your writing opening – or closing – doors to your impact work?

How do you write impact reports well? A dark-haired man in white, button-through shirt man sits at an office desk with a laptop and documents. His head is buried in his hands as though he doesn't know where to start..
Posted on

How to write impact reports that people actually read – and act on

They're your organisation's chance to make an impact on your readers, in more ways than one. Find out how to write impact reports well and how you can leverage them for full value.

Reading time: 4 minutes | By Lee Ellwood

Do you see impact reports as little-read compliance documents, something you have to produce to meet legislation or funding requirements? Think again: they can also be an important tactic in your communications strategy.

That's why it's worth knowing how to write an impact report that people notice – and why a clear, confident, inspiring report can be one of the hardest-working documents your organisation produces.

So if you've been googling 'how to write impact reports' or 'what should be included in an impact report' only to be overwhelmed by AI suggestions, ugly templates and corporate jargon, this article’s for you. We'll walk you through the essentials and show you what separates an ‘okay’ impact report from a truly impactful one.

Why do impact reports matter?

Impact reports for social impact organisations can have more value than you expect. They may be program-specific, accounting for progress and expenditure. They may be annual reports, dictated by legislation or governance obligations. But whatever their purpose, you can use impact reporting to do so much more than be accountable.

A well-written impact report:

  • establishes trust with funders, donors, partners and the communities you serve
  • attracts funding by demonstrating you know what you're doing
  • builds your credibility as an evidence-led voice in your sector
  • yields content you can repurpose across your website, grant applications and social media
  • celebrates your team and volunteers, reminding them that their work is making a difference.

A good example is an annual philanthropic report, generated by donation-driven organisations. It’s an accountability tool, but also a PR exercise – aimed at inspiring more donors and continued donations.

What should be included in an impact report?

Whether you're new to the task or refreshing your current approach, every compelling impact report should cover these essential points.

  • 1. Context: you and your mission. Briefly orient readers: who are you, who do you serve and what are you trying to change? Don't assume people already know.
  • 2. Approach: your theory of change. What activities do you deliver, and what outcomes do you expect them to produce? This is the basis of your whole report.
  • 3. Method: your data and evidence. It’s impossible to report on social outcomes without measuring their impact. Be ready to substantiate your statements with solid evidence.
  • 4. Connection: your stories. Data tells readers what happened; stories tell them why it matters. Case studies, client quotes and practitioner reflections bring your numbers to life.
  • 5. Reflection: your learnings. The best impact reports are honest about what worked, what didn't and what you've changed as a result. Transparency earns respect.
  • 6. Projection: your forward look. Where are you headed? What are your priorities for the next year or funding cycle?

Those are the main elements of an impact report. There may be other sections you’re required, or want, to include. But keep them relevant; don’t add sections just to make the report seem more substantial.

The challenges in writing impact reports

These reports are important, complex, deadline-driven and high-profile. (Ha. What could possibly go wrong?) Here are some of the difficulties we’ve seen.

  • The data challenge: outputs, not outcomes. Many organisations collect data in systems that weren’t designed with storytelling in mind. Come reporting time, your evidence is lacking or talks about outputs (how many activities were delivered) rather than outcomes (how people's lives changed). Measuring impact needs to be built in from the start.
  • The stakeholder challenge: multiple voices. Even small social impact organisations will have multiple people contributing to or signing off on their reporting (or wanting to). The result can be an inconsistent and unclear document. Your impact report needs to display one voice and one mission: the organisation’s.
  • The jargon challenge: excluded readers. Social impact work is full of specialised terms and acronyms that mean nothing to people outside it: ‘theory of change’, ‘SDG alignment’, ‘logic models’, ESG, SROI … Good impact report writing translates this jargon into plain language that everyone can engage with.
  • The structure challenge: unclear story. A report with all the right content but an illogical order – with no narrative thread – will lose readers fast, because it’s too hard for them to know what’s going on. Structure and flow are just as important as substance.
  • The time challenge: maxed-out teams. Impact reports take a lot of work. When reporting falls to a program manager or administrator who’s already working at capacity or doesn’t have a communications skillset, the results can’t be optimal.

A step-by-step guide to drafting an impact report

From blank page to polished document, here's how to write impact reports that people will actually read and act on.

Step 1: Know your audience

Who will actually read this, and why: funders? Community members? Government? The board? Plan your report with your main audience – and their needs – front of mind.

Step 2: Gather your data early

Pull together your quantitative data (numbers, percentages, reach figures) and your qualitative evidence (surveys, case studies, interviews) before you start writing.

Step 3: Decide your narrative

Before you start drafting, identify the theme or achievement that will tie your impact report together. What's the central story of this reporting period?

Step 4: Structure before you write

Create a simple outline based on the essential elements listed above. Draft sections in bullet points first, then write prose. AI can be helpful here, if you know how to prompt it well.

Step 5: Write clearly and humanly

Use plain language, active voice and real stories. Write in varied sentence lengths but nothing over about 25 words. Cover one idea per paragraph.

Step 6: Check your claims

Check everything: every statistic, outcome claim and attribution should be accurate and verifiable. Don’t trust AI to get its facts right: always have a human be the last layer of quality.

Step 7: Edit ruthlessly

Cut out waffle, tighten the language, and make sure every sentence earns its place. Then get someone else – a knowledgable colleague or, better, a professional editor – to read it critically.

Consider getting expert help

Your organisation is doing amazing work. Your impact report should say so, loud and clear. Knowing how to write impact reports well is vital for your cause, and knowing where to get help with them is strategic.

But, let's be real: maybe writing isn't your strongest suit, or time just isn’t available. Maybe you recognise the value in having your report objectively reviewed before it goes out.

Editors and writing consultants can do this. We can help with impact reporting at every stage: from structuring the report and stengthening its narrative to editing your drafts, blending multiple voices into one and giving the final document a thorough, professional polish.

Even if outside help is not an option right now, the tips in this article should help your impact reports serve your organisation to the maximum. Once you recognise just how valuable they really can be, you can start to rethink your approach.

Photo by Lev Dolgachov, Depositphoto, by licence

Four people seated around a meeting table, writing. One woman is staring in frustration at the viewer.
Posted on

'Frankenstein reports': how multi-author writing can undermine impact

Multi-author writing is the backbone of reports, funding applications and project approvals in government and for-purpose comms. But is it quietly sabotaging your impact?

Reading time: 5 mins | By Lee Ellwood | Copyedited by Kylie Howard

It’s report time, and your contributors have been hard at work. Your policy expert drafted the background, and your data analyst compiled the findings. The frontline teams summarised their activities, and your communications officer put it all together in the template. Your report – vital for getting sign-off, or funding, or eyeballs – is complete.

Complete, but not finished. You have words, but do they work?

When you read through the report, you have to admit they don’t. The document’s tone jumps from academic to conversational to bureaucratic. Key terms are defined differently in each section. Some pages use Australian English spelling, while others follow US conventions. The executive summary promises outcomes the body of the report never delivers, while the conclusion overlooks the most important achievement.

Just like Frankenstein, multi-author writing has created a monster: a horror stitched together from mismatched parts into something that won’t do what you want it to.

The risks of multi-author writing

Collaborating isn’t a problem in itself – that’s how you leverage everyone’s perspectives and expertise.

Government departments rely on cross-functional teams to develop policy documents. Annual reports draw on input from every part of the organisation.

Research papers and grant applications are often compiled by people from multiple institutions, departments and disciplines. Social impact organisations need input from program staff, evaluators and fundraising teams to create compelling impact reports.

The issue lies in the assumption that multiple expert contributions will automatically blend into a cohesive, professional document. They won't, and here's why.

  • Everyone has their own personal writing style and habits, so whatever your contributors hand in will vary in language, tone and voice from everyone else’s.
  • Everyone has different computer settings and app preferences, from default US English to the old Word vs Google Docs argument.
  • Contributors work in isolation, so they may not understand how their section fits into the report, what form it should take and whether their piece contradicts or connects to everyone else's.
  • Roles and responsibilities within the project are often assumed and ill-defined, meaning duplications, omissions and blame games disrupt workflows and confuse everyone.
  • Sorting out the inconsistencies and duplication uses up valuable project time; corners – and quality – are cut to meet the deadline.
  • One person needs to have a bird’s-eye view of the whole document so they can make sure it is ‘whole’, but often there are multiple stakeholders further up the chain who have their own ideas.

What a collaborative document can cost you

It's not a matter of a bit of weak writing. Your Frankenstein report can cause big problems for the success of your purpose-led work, costing your organisation:

  • Credibility. When your impact report switches between ‘programme’ and ‘program’ or defines success differently across sections, readers notice. If you can’t get the basics right, should they trust your data? Your conclusions? Your organisation?
  • Reader engagement. The Australian Government style manual points out that clarity and consistency are essential for ensuring government content is useful and engaging. This is true for any writing: when readers encounter jarring shifts in tone or contradictory information, they stop reading. For purpose-based documents, that’s a big problem.
  • Time and money. You’ve already spent weeks coordinating contributions from busy SMEs. Now you’re spending more time emailing revisions, smoothing out inconsistencies, clarifying contradictions or managing arguments. And your deadline is getting closer and closer.
  • Hoped-for outcomes. The grant application with the muddled methodology section gets rejected. The impact report that doesn’t clearly articulate your achievements is filed and forgotten. The policy brief that buries its recommendations in jargon is ignored by the minister’s office.

How professional editing can save you

Writing documents and compiling information are one thing; ensuring impact and connection is another.

You need SMEs to provide the ideas and data. But to ensure everything works together, you also need someone with expertise in creating coherent, consistent, professional documents from multiple inputs. Someone who can preserve each contributor’s expertise while ensuring the final product speaks with one clear voice.

That ‘someone’ is a professional editor.

When you engage an editor, they will ask about the purpose of the document, its intended audience and what issues you think need attention. Only then will they start on one or two rounds of reviews of the text, identifying and fixing issues as well as suggesting improvements you might not have thought of.

How your organisation wins

If you’re in government, research or the social impact sector, effective writing is critical – and collaboration is how work gets done. Policy briefs, grant applications, impact and evaluation reports, research papers and annual reports all require input from multiple SMEs.

Professional editing is the difference between a document that achieves its purpose and one that undermines your credibility while wasting everyone’s time. Instead of a Frankenstein, you’ll have:

  • A well-structured, flowing document. Sometimes the problem isn’t that each section is poorly written but that they’re in the wrong order, or certain points are buried, or the document would flow better with a completely different structure. An editor can see these issues and develop a structure that works.
  • An audience-appropriate tone. An editor can moderate between the researcher who wants to list every reference, the CEO who wants to shine, and the communications officer who wants snappy socials, delivering a tone that’s both credible and appropriate for your target readership.
  • Cohesive messaging. Professional editors look at how ideas flow across sections. They eliminate redundancy, resolve contradictions and ensure your introduction promises – and your conclusion reinforces – what your body delivers.
  • Consistency in the details. Your editor will ensure your document uses one variety of English, defines terms consistently and has consistent formatting. And it matters: the Australian Government style manual exists precisely because consistency across written communications builds public trust.
  • Bonus prize: harmonious working relationships. When your colleague points out problems with your section of the document, it can feel personal. When an external editor points things out, it’s just part of the process. Bringing in an editor allows everyone to focus on their expertise without the friction of critiquing each other’s writing – or, inadvertently, work.

How not to Frankenstein your documents

Here’s a better way to approach your next writing project.

  • Before work starts, create a clear style guide for the project. The Australian Government style manual is your best resource, or your editor can create one for you.
  • Assign clear project roles. Decide who will accept, reject and rework the contributions, and give them the authority to do it properly.
  • Provide context. Provide everyone with an overview of the final product’s structure and templates for sections to guide them in the shaping of their writing.
  • Engage a professional editor. Factor editing into your timeline and budget from the beginning, and you’ll be thrilled with your foresight!

Your work deserves to be read, understood and acted on. Your credibility depends on your ability to communicate clearly. That means clear, cohesive and consistent reports and documents.

That’s what your editor wants, too.

Looking for help with your next multi-author writing? EllWords specialises in long-form editing and writing for government, research and social impact organisations. We turn complex collaborative documents into clear, consistent, and credible communications.

Get in touch with us and avoid another Frankenstein.

The Ellwords team in a meeting around a timber table. From left to right, Kylie Howard, Lee Ellwood, Sally Eadie and Penny Hayes.
Posted on

Small team, big difference: how freelance collectives benefit your communication

When you’re outsourcing writing and editing, hiring a group-structured freelance collective can be a particularly smart choice.

Reading time: 2 minutes | By Lee Ellwood

Outsourcing the editing and writing tasks in your communications plan is smart and efficient. When deciding which freelancer to book, consider the advantages of a collective or group operation.

Many communications freelancers offer their services in a formal or informal partnership with colleagues who have complementary skills. This is a huge plus for overloaded people in communications, marketing, PR, research and reporting roles.

Why? Because collectives and groups bring you maximum availability, diverse technical skills, extra flexibility and optimum reliability—everything you need to support your upcoming campaign or deadline with good, effective writing.

The benefits of freelance collectives

  • Our group structure brings together writers and editors with different backgrounds, experiences and specialised skill sets.
    This means extra creativity, broader perspectives and more valuable input, leaving your content richer, higher quality and appropriately voiced for your sector.
  • Working as a group maximises our availability, so your project is more likely to get a ‘yes!’ from us.
    The ability to co-work simultaneously (using collaboration tools like OneDrive and Teams) often means we can meet tight deadlines.
  • Your project is less likely to encounter delays due to illness, leave or workload bottlenecks, because our group always has a back-up writer or editor.
    If one editor or writer is called away unexpectedly, another can pick up the work, supported by our internal collaboration processes such as Teams and Asana.
  • Having multiple sets of eyes on board means your written communication receives even more thorough editing, proofreading and fact-checking.
    At EllWords, for example, we cross-review each other’s work to catch errors and inconsistencies and ensure high quality writing for our clients.
  • Working collectively allows for brainstorming, creative problem-solving and sharing of specialist skills and industry knowledge.
    We can draw on our whole group membership to flexibly and creatively meet your communication needs.
  • As a group with an established cross-sector network, we can readily scale up or down to suit your requirements for any particular project.
    The combination of all our separate professional networks means you have access to a very wide resource base.
  • Being a collective service means that more complex projects can be shared to leverage members’ individual strengths.
    We can allocate different stages of your project to the best editor or writer for that type of task (think: research, evaluation, fact-checking, copywriting or editing). As well as delivering quality output, this keeps projects on the move and minimises bottlenecks in peak periods.

EllWords—your freelance collective

Choosing a collective gets you a higher and more reliable level of service with more expertise, broader availability, collaborative quality control, strong and diverse networks, and the flexibility to meet a wide range of communications needs.

EllWords is a case in point. Everyone in our group is an established solo freelance editor and/or writer, but pooling our skill sets, professional backgrounds, creative perspectives and availability translates into successful outcomes for our clients. Back that up with our commitment to your communication goals, and it’s a sure-fire recipe for success.

Get in touch today to find out how the EllWords ‘good writing’ group can support your communication, stress-free.